Various leaders have different approaches in their modes of leadership, which is evident in a comparison between Slobodan Milošević and Pope Francis. Slobodan Milošević was Serbia’s president and a political leader as he was the head of several different movements in Yugoslav and Serbia. The mode of leadership exercised by Milošević faced numerous criticisms because it was against a number of cultural values. Pope Francis recently advised the Catholic congregation requesting them to avoid instances whereby they lift up their cellphones during mass and focus more on lifting their hearts. Critics believed that Milošević, in conjunction with his allies practiced nationalism, which was against the Yugoslav communist practice.
The essence of encouraging communism over nationalism was to promote a system that guaranteed brotherhood as well as unity among members. During Milošević’s regime, it was notable that violence arose in around 1990 after the foundation of the Serbian Democratic Party by Serbs who lived in Croatia. The party advocated for autonomy as well as secession within predominant Serb regions within Croatia. Later, an emergence of conflict amid Croatian law enforcement officers and Serbs in 1991 followed the attempt by Croatian Serbs to strengthen their authority in more regions that had significant numbers of Serb populations.
Amid the endless acts of violence within the region, Milošević alongside four other top ranked officials in the government engaged in joint criminal activities. The main objective of their mission was to remove a reasonable portion of Albanian populations from Kosovo, which would pave way for Serbs to preside over other provinces. Milošević demonstrated a unique level of concern for the Serbs as well as Albanians within Kosovo as the intensity of their acts of violence deepened. Milošević played an important role in the occurrence of the Yugoslav War where he authorized a Serbian nationalist schema in addition to taking advantage of the developing crowd wave that comprised of Serbian nationalists for reinforcing a centralized mode of leadership with the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY). The Pope’s message came after he noticed the current trend of worshipers paying attention more on taking his photos instead of lifting their hearts to Lord.
The message is a clear way for the Pope to ensure that his congregation benefits more from teachings along with readings from his mass. The remarks made by the Pope attracted a great level of concern with people applauding because he made a reasonable judgment about Catholics and their modern cultural trend that appears to hinder their ability to benefit from Church masses. The Pope targeted not only the congregation, but also the priests as well as bishops who often take out their mobile phones to take pictures of him during mass. It is certain that the message was redirected to the entire Catholic Church community across the globe, as it has become a common occurrence during most of the Pope’s masses. Prior to his statement concerning the use of cell phones during a church mass, Pope Francis previously questioned his faithful congregation to consider an outcome whereby they would check their Bible as often as they did their mobile phones.
In comparison, leaders such as Pope Francis and Slobodan Milošević practiced different modes of leadership. From a critical perspective, it is certain that the Pope makes a justifiable point as a leader because Catholics are likely to benefit more from letting cell phones affect their faith and focus. It is evident that Milošević objected the idea that he practiced nationalism during his reign. His authority exploited Serbian nationalism especially as Milošević rose in leadership. Comparatively, the Pope sets a remarkable example as a leader because he condemns other necessary figures of the Catholic congregation such as Bishops and Priests from such actions during mass. It is debatable that the people may follow an example from their Church leaders and avoid taking pictures of Pope Francis during mass to enable them gain more from his readings and teachings.