In the state of Arizona today, hunting is viewed as a major activity to be done today with having many rules of law that are laid down to this effect. The existing bills that have been passed before including those that set out limitations that tend to bracket how, where and when aspects of hunting are done. In this particular article, the essence of it all emits from the proposal that the use of silencers is introduced and added as a necessity to hunters. The argument behind all of this included the fact that these are individuals respecting the law and going through a lot of trouble just to be within the law and aspect that many individuals always tend to ignore altogether.

These claims are specifically modified for reducing noise pollution and inherently through the same process prevent the increasing number of hearing loss patients in the state. These claims are not that convincing as the reasons were given towards preventing such issue from arising all outweigh the latter. Such grievances in comparison to the reasons for being of a better reasoning angle. Now, the issue of hunting endangered species is the hottest topic and the use of suppressors with the key function of only reducing hearing loss claims just is not catching it.

The HB 2537 bill that is being brought forth for a proposal claim states that adds penalties state wise. This is for those people who hunt endangered species. An issue that is being backed up wildly worldly. The proposal demanding that hunters take up the use of silencers has come out to be a major proposal to be introduced in the state of Arizona.

In conclusion, the proposals laid out in this particular article had a major reasoning for and against it, however, it is critical to note that the article’s main argument needed a bit more backing.