Nuclear power has traditionally provoked a lot of criticism as to the possible health risks, security threats, and financial costs. At the same time, supporters of nuclear energy find their arguments in considerations of climate change and energy security. The benefits that nuclear plants bring are manifold and should be underestimated. They provide a reliable energy source that does not depend significantly on external environmental conditions or resources. (Corner)

Nevertheless, the peculiar context of building new power plants in South Florida has to be examined for tangible risks and threats. Even though nuclear power is cleaner than the natural gas industry, the building of new plants can be detrimental for the share of renewable energy sources such as solar and wind power. One should not overlook the enormous potential of solar energy in Florida. The lessons from European liberalized markets suggest that renewables can, in fact, be competitive and even phase out other electricity sources with no or little state support. (Lipp)

Besides the issue of shares of different energy types, nuclear plants provoke security risks. It is especially worrisome that the project is carried out in South Florida where the risk of rising sea levels is pertinent. The recent tragic events in Japan show that even the top-notch protective constructions are not entirely reliable. Nuclear power bears an inherently higher threat to the lives of humans and a safe environment than other types of energy. In any case, if these power plants were built, one should demand a very high level of scrutiny over the protection system and the reliability of domes. Numerous studies on associated environmental risks would need to be done before giving clearance to building new plants. Finally, the acquiring of licenses by Florida Power and Light (FPL) would encourage the company to build a new transmission line that raises concerns in regard to the possible loss of jobs on that commercial corridor.

Given that sufficiently concrete risks and disadvantages outweigh rather vague and general benefits of building new nuclear plants in the specific South Florida context, I would certainly vote against the licenses. At the very least, I would demand an increased level of scrutiny measures with regard to environmental and security threats.