The subject under examination is to evaluate why the GMO ban in France may be considered a bad decision, while reviewing alternative positions. First, the decision was based on a scientific study which was later refuted, rescinded, and then resubmitted. Other considerations include the farmers’ freedom to select what and how they farm, as well as the fact that these decisions are more politically based and influenced rather than supported by the proper scientific evaluation.

One component of France’s decision was based on questionable science. The Séralini Study, published in September 2012, specified that GMO maize was the principal cause for serious health concerns due to an increase in tumors as well as kidney and liver damage. In 2013, Audrey Garric published a paper refuting the legitimacy of the study for various reasons including, but not limited to, the limited sample size, defective statistical analysis, and insufficient consultation of prior research resulting in the withdrawal of the study from publication in 2013. Alternatively, the argument to discredit the Séralini Study was itself soon contradicted creating a scientific quagmire and the republishing of the Séralini Study in June 2014. The dissimilar science supports the variance in perspectives.

Setting aside science for a moment another effect of banning GMO is on the farming industry in France. The farmers must comply with regulations causing a problematic economic effect as well as their freedom and ability to provide produce to consumers and other industries that utilize these products. It is essential that the farmer has the independence to determine the viability of the GMO. Moreover, it is critical that the “farmer…must be free to choose between GMOs and non-GMOs” (Glon 2101). It should be farmers and science not farmers versus politicians.

A further consideration is that it is opposing political coalitions that are driving the dissension of the argument directly at the French regulators and decision makers. It is between those on the Green side versus those support GMOs. While France is subject to certain regulations from the European Union (EU) it also retains the power to override specific decisions through their own local regulations. The Touriel article illustrates the discord and the alternative argument presented by both parties.

There are several reasons for France to reconsider the GMO ban. Questionable and contradictory scientific studies, limiting farmer’s freedom, the incessant political power struggle and hope for a fresh perspective in France’s future.