Justice is presently defined by many people as the moral rightness and the act of administering the correct punishment for those who deserve it. Many people argue that justice is an act of being fair especially when solving conflicts or issues. They believe that justice prevails when the wrongdoer get...

Throughout the history of the criminal justice system, the defenses of people who have allegedly committed crimes have included many traditional arguments as well as extremely creative attempts to defend then. In two recent cases, defense attorneys used an updated version of a traditional self-defense argument, and another case involved...

Legal theories help law practitioners to understand the various laws and how they are applied in real life. After studying the theories, they get to practice and test the theories in an actual environment. They opt to understand the various behaviours and how they can be used to enact justice...

There are several reasons for jury nullification, which can be divided into conventional and non-conventional explanations. Under conventional nullification, the jury nullifies a verdict by misapplying or disregarding the law (Fougère, 2018). The argument for the practice is that strict application of the law may lead to societal injustice. The...

Under normal circumstances, juries are expected to hear cases and determine the guilt or innocence of defendants. When one is confirmed guilty, the jury's role is to convict for the crimes. However, there are instances when juries find one guilty but acquit them. Even though the jury's power to acquit...