IntroductionOne of the documents given to patients is the prescription form as part of the health education material. The form indicates the diagnosis of a patient and provides information for effective prognosis. The document is used to show the relevance of proper medical dispensation and the essence of effective prognosis to allow regular medical checkups. Significantly, the form helps a patient become aware of the probably diagnosis tools for the given infection (Liebner, 2015). Precisely, the document has been selected to act as a reference point to a patient by providing guidelines to a healthy living to curtail future diseases.
Review of the Document
Effectively, the document is targeted to those who are at their youth stage and are able to read and write with less difficulty. Nonetheless, the application of the document is enhanced through the presence of readers who are at their middle reading level. Alongside that, readers are mostly male who in most cases are attacked by infections. Furthermore, the document is specifically issued to those who have physical disabilities or mental incapacitation and would want to receive the best of medical care. Nevertheless, the document is given to readers who are diverse in their cultural practices but get affected by out dated cultural involvements like female genital mutilation (Harris et al., 2015). Moreover, the document is a special tool medical examination to assists patients who suffer from low self-esteem and need a steadfast medical checkup. The educational level of both the material and the readers lies within the standard scope of medical examination. It was easy to understand and the degree of analysis was also attainable. Centrally, the height of analysis of the document takes a vast and incisive form to enhance medical examination and provide room for proper diagnosis, hence, effective prognosis.
Summary and Suggested Revisions
The document is enhanced through an accurate analysis of its role regarding the six-point agenda that makes it effective and proactive. The message content is precise and easy to understand since it is gives direct and precise information to assist in effective diagnosis (Eadie, 2014). Nonetheless, the text appearance is conspicuous to allow for easy readability. Nevertheless, visuals in the document are transparent to allow room for effective comprehension of health status. The layout and design is well organized to favor easy comprehension of the document and allow room for fast tracking of medical checkup. Its translation is not effective and needs more boost. However, it is a document that is easily understood and interpreted for accurate medical checkup.
One of the critical areas to revise on the document is the area of translation in which the document is applicable. It should be an open document to everyone but not take a restrictive measure through reduced translation that makes it ineffective. Within the scope of the document, there need to be a consideration of to include a strong translation ground to boots assessment and enhance effective analysis.
Conclusion
Notably, the document is effective to allow medical diagnosis reach its peak and favor boosted life expectancy. It is within the document that the rate of medical diagnosis is beefed and the height of medication scaled. The document takes note of the need for relay of information to patients and opens a window for proper medical care to patients. It also ensures that there is profound understanding of the medical options to enhance both rehabilitation and prevention of future infections to a patient. Most patients are made to understand the scope of their health statues through the issuance of the prescription form.
- Eadie, C. (2014). Health literacy: A conceptual review. MedSurg Nursing, 23(1), S1-S1.
- Harris, L., Thomas, V., & Fox, M. (2015). The influence of health care literacy on the use of PHRs among older adults. MedSurg Nursing, 24(4), 283-286.
- Liebner, L. T. (2015). I can’t read that! Improving perioperative literacy for ambulatory surgical patients. AORN journal, 101(4), 416-427.
